Loading article...
Loading article...

Generating AI summary...
An investigation by Investigate Europe, in collaboration with the Guardian and other media partners, has found that US tech companies, including Microsoft, successfully lobbied the EU to hide the environmental toll of their datacentres. The secrecy provision, which was added to EU rules in 2024, hinders scrutiny of the pollution that individual datacentres emit, leaving researchers with just national-level summaries of their energy footprints.
In 2024, the EU introduced a new set of rules for datacentres, which included a secrecy provision that would keep individual datacentre information confidential. The provision was demanded by US tech companies, including Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta, who cited commercial interests. The final text of the article, which differs by just a couple of words from industry demands, states that "the commission and member states concerned shall keep confidential all information and key performance indicators for individual datacentres that are communicated to the database."
The secrecy provision hinders scrutiny of the pollution that individual datacentres emit, leaving researchers with just national-level summaries of their energy footprints. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to track the environmental impact of AI and datacentres, which is a growing concern as the industry continues to expand. The EU aims to triple its datacentre capacity in the next five to seven years, which will only exacerbate the problem.
The secrecy provision has already been used to shield datacentres from scrutiny. In an email citing the secrecy clause, a senior commission official reminded national authorities of their obligation to "keep confidential all information and key performance indicators for individual datacentres." This has led to a lack of transparency and accountability in the industry, which is a major concern for researchers and environmental groups.
The secrecy provision is not only a setback for transparency and accountability but also a threat to the EU's commitment to environmental protection. The Aarhus convention, which the EU is a signatory to, requires that environmental information be systematically made available to the public. The secrecy provision clearly violates this convention and EU transparency rules.
Q: What is the secrecy provision, and how did it come about? A: The secrecy provision is a provision in EU rules that keeps individual datacentre information confidential. It was introduced in 2024 due to lobbying by US tech companies, including Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta.
Q: Why is the secrecy provision a concern for researchers and environmental groups? A: The secrecy provision hinders scrutiny of the pollution that individual datacentres emit, leaving researchers with just national-level summaries of their energy footprints. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to track the environmental impact of AI and datacentres.
Source: The Guardian
Q: What are the implications of the secrecy provision for the EU's commitment to environmental protection? A: The secrecy provision clearly violates the Aarhus convention and EU transparency rules, which require that environmental information be systematically made available to the public. This sets a bad precedent for the industry and undermines the EU's commitment to environmental protection.